Compare baseline turnover with turnover among employees covered by a hybrid policy. This calculator estimates the change in annual departures, the employees retained or lost, and the corresponding replacement-cost impact for workforce planning.
A positive result represents estimated additional employees retained; a negative result represents additional expected departures. Decimal employees are expected values, not literal partial people.
This is a scenario estimate, not proof that the work policy caused the turnover difference. Use comparable periods and populations.
For 750 employees, a change from 16% baseline turnover to 12.5% hybrid turnover avoids 26.25 expected departures. At $22,000 each, the estimated annual replacement cost avoided is $577,500.
No. It quantifies a rate difference but does not isolate the policy from pay, management, labor-market, or workforce-mix effects.
Turnover rates produce an expected annual value. Use the decimal for budgeting and interpret actual departures as whole people.
Include the costs relevant to your decision, such as recruiting, onboarding, temporary coverage, and lost productivity, without double counting.
Yes. If policy turnover exceeds baseline turnover, the result is presented as added replacement cost.
Yes. Both turnover rates should cover comparable roles, time periods, and eligibility groups for a useful comparison.
| Output sign | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Positive employees | Fewer expected departures |
| Zero | No modeled turnover change |
| Negative employees | More expected departures |