Calculate standard overall equipment effectiveness from availability, performance, and quality, then pair it with the facility’s energy intensity for the same run. OEE remains a time-and-output measure; energy per good unit is shown separately so the two ideas are not blended into a made-up score. This view helps a production team spot whether operational effectiveness and energy use moved together.
OEE shows how much of the theoretical planned-time opportunity became good production. Energy intensity supplies a separate resource view.
An OEE above 100% usually means the ideal cycle time, counts, or time boundary is inconsistent.
For 480 planned minutes, 45 minutes of downtime, a 0.5-minute ideal cycle, 760 total units, and 735 good units, availability is 90.63%, performance is 87.36%, quality is 96.71%, and OEE is 76.56%. At 950 kWh, energy intensity is 1.293 kWh per good unit.
No. Standard OEE multiplies availability, performance, and quality; energy intensity is reported separately.
Standard OEE should not. A result above 100% points to inconsistent input data, often the ideal cycle time.
Remove only time your site defines as not scheduled for production, and apply that rule consistently.
Total count is used for performance, while good count divided by total count determines quality.
It reveals whether operational effectiveness improved while energy required for each saleable unit rose or fell.
| Item | How it is used |
|---|---|
| Availability | Calculator input in the displayed unit |
| Performance | Calculator input in the displayed unit |
| Quality | Calculator input in the displayed unit |
| Energy per good unit | Calculator input in the displayed unit |